The Power 100 Asks a Question the Cannabis Industry Hasn't Fully Answered

The cannabis industry has spent years celebrating its growth. Awards ceremonies. Best-of lists. Magazine covers featuring founders who raised millions and opened dispensaries in states where possession was a felony just a decade ago.

The celebration isn't wrong. Legal cannabis represents real progress.

But Minorities for Medical Marijuana just released something different. The Power 100 isn't another industry accolade. It's a historical record of 100 Black leaders who built the foundation for cannabis reform before there was any money in it.

Before legalization became a business model, these people were risking everything.

The List That Functions as an Archive

M4MM founder and CEO Roz McCarthy framed it clearly: "This list is about impact, not optics. It documents who showed up early, stayed when it was difficult, and carried the weight of advocacy when there was no economic upside."

The Power 100 will live permanently on M4MM's website. Profiles, historical context, updates over time. The organization, which marks its 10th anniversary this year with 27 state directors across the country, built this as continuity rather than a one-cycle announcement.

This matters because the cannabis industry often moves faster than its memory.

The people who shaped reform before it was profitable are not the same people who own the dispensaries now. The gap between who built the movement and who benefits from the market reveals something uncomfortable about how legalization actually happened.

The Numbers Tell a Different Story Than the Press Releases

Less than 2% of legal cannabis businesses are Black-owned.

Read that again. In an industry projected to surpass $40 billion in 2024, Black entrepreneurs represent somewhere between 1.2% and 1.7% of business owners. A 2017 survey showed 81% of cannabis business owners were white, while only 4.3% were Black. The percentage has declined since then.

This isn't an accident. It's a structure.

Starting a cannabis business requires at least $250,000 in capital for fees, licensure, and operating costs. Because cannabis remains federally illegal, banks cannot grant typical business loans. Equity entrepreneurs compete against well-resourced players who entered the market with established capital.

The people who carried the advocacy when it was dangerous often cannot participate in the industry they helped create.

The War on Drugs Targeted Black Communities by Design

Cannabis prohibition began in the early 20th century. The foundation was racism, not science. Laws originally targeted Latinos and Black jazz musicians.

John Ehrlichman, a domestic policy aide to Nixon, admitted in a 1994 interview: "By getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and the blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities."

The disruption worked.

Despite roughly equal usage rates across racial groups, Black people are 3.73 times more likely than whites to be arrested for marijuana. The Black incarceration rate exploded from about 600 per 100,000 people in 1970 to 1,808 in 2000 following stiffer penalties for crack cocaine and other drugs.

Many of the Power 100 honorees were advocating for reform during this exact period.

They weren't building brands. They were trying to keep people out of prison.

Recognition as Correction

The Power 100 reframes what "cannabis pioneer" means.

A pioneer isn't someone who opened a dispensary in 2018 after legalization passed. A pioneer is someone who organized community meetings when possession could cost you years. Someone who testified at legislative hearings when cannabis advocacy could end your career. Someone who built patient access networks before medical programs existed.

The list centers people who shaped reform before it was profitable. That centering raises a question the industry has largely avoided.

Who benefits from legalization, and whose work made it possible?

The distance between those two groups is where the equity conversation actually lives.

What the Industry Celebrates Versus What It Owes

Cannabis companies talk about social equity programs. Some are genuine. Others stop short of structural change. The industry celebrates diversity in marketing materials while the ownership structure remains overwhelmingly white.

The Power 100 doesn't ask for performative gestures. It asks for acknowledgment.

These 100 leaders built the intellectual, cultural, and political foundation that made the current market possible. Their contributions predate the business model. Their risks enabled the profits.

M4MM plans to support the list with editorial amplification, interviews, and digital storytelling throughout the year. The goal is permanence. The industry evolves quickly, and without deliberate archiving, the people who made it possible disappear from the narrative.

The Structural Question Remains

The Power 100 is not about guilt. It's about accuracy.

The cannabis industry grew from advocacy, organizing, and risk-taking that happened in Black communities when there was no economic incentive. The people who did that work deserve recognition. They also deserve participation in the market they helped create.

The current ownership structure suggests we've built legalization without equity.

That's not a moral failure. It's a structural one. The barriers to entry are financial, regulatory, and systemic. Fixing them requires more than recognition. It requires capital access, policy reform, and a willingness to redistribute opportunity in an industry that already has established winners.

The Power 100 doesn't solve that problem. But it makes the problem visible.

What Comes After Recognition

Whether the cannabis industry will reconcile its growth with its origins remains uncertain. The momentum is toward consolidation, not equity. Large operators absorb smaller ones. Capital flows to established players.

But the Power 100 creates a record that can't be erased.

The people on this list shaped cannabis culture, patient access, policy reform, and community organizing before anyone was getting rich. Their work made the current industry possible. That work predates the profits, and it matters more than the profits.

Recognition is the starting point, not the finish line.

The question is whether the industry will move beyond recognition toward actual equity.

What comes next depends on whether today's industry leaders are willing to connect growth with responsibility.

‍